ABSTRACT
@#Introduction: Home medication review (HMR) involves a patient-centered approach, extending continuity of care to the community setting with the intention of improving medication use and health outcome. The delivery of HMR services in Malaysia remains limited to urban hospitals and clinics. Current study aimed to explore the perception and acceptability of HMR in older adults. Methods: In-depth individual interviews were conducted among adults aged ≥65 years old, taking ≥5 medications, recruited from geriatrics clinics at a tertiary teaching hospital. Home interviews were conducted among 12 older adults and care givers between April to June 2019. Interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analysed through descriptive interpretive approach of qualitative data analysis. Results: HMR provided participants with opportunities to discuss medication-related issues with pharmacists in conducive environments. Pharmacists provided information which improved knowledge on indications, dosages and safe storage of medications through HMR. Participants experienced relief and developed confidence in medication self-management. Conclusion: The importance of follow-up visits to ensure adequate monitoring and continuity of care were emphasized. Larger quantitative studies are required to determine the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of HMR to justify the implementation and expansion of this service
ABSTRACT
@#Online health information have a role in enhancing health in older adults. However, age-related physiological changes and non-senior friendly websites proved to be a challenge for older adults. Research investigating older adults’ preferences of features in health information websites is limited. Thus, in this review, we aim to summarize older adults’ preferences regarding the design and content of health websites. Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles in February 2018, using key words ‘older adults’, ‘Internet’, ‘health information’ and ‘usability’. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the McMaster critical appraisal tools by two independent reviewers. Individual study design, participants’ characteristics, and identified preferences for health website features were extracted and summarized narratively. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018096281). Five studies (3 qualitative, 2 quantitative) were included in this review. The quality appraisal score ranged from 32% to 83%. The web feature preferences of older adults were grouped into three domains: web presentation factors, web navigation factors and health information preferences. The results highlight older adults have specific preferences when engaging with online content. This review suggests that readable text, simple design, consistent layout and straightforward web navigation are the preferred priorities for a health information website for older adults. Findings from this review may be useful to healthcare professionals and developers to understand older adults’ preferences pertaining to web design and contents in health websites specifically designed for this population.